Blog Layout

WAC International Contribution to Synodal Process

Colm Holmes • Feb 25, 2022

Preparing the 2023 synod of bishops

 

WAC contribution to the synodal process

Preparing the 2023 synod of bishops

 

Introduction[1]

 

The We Are Church International (WAC) offers its contribution to Synod 2021-2023   "For a Synodal Church : Communion, Participation, and Mission " in light of the Preparatory Document and, in particular, the " Ten Thematic Nuclei to be Explored ".

To-day, in our Catholic Church, the "journeying together", that « enacts and manifests the
nature of the Church as the pilgrim and missionary People of God » (PD 1) and “allows the Church to proclaim the Gospel” (PD 2), is realized in a very weak and defective way because :

a) the hierarchical dimension and the concentration of power in the ordained ministers generate a systemic separation between them and the laity who are merely executors,

b) there are few examples of synodality since the councils that do exist (pastoral, presbyteral, etc.) are then merely consultative, and

c) the few successful achievements of synodality are linked to the personality, ideas and availability of open-minded ordained ministers. But they are subject to his will and often disappear when he moves on.

All this generated a “culture imbued with clericalism … and with those forms of exercising authority on which the different types of abuse (power, economic, conscience, sexual) are grafted. " (PD 6). To remedy this, the Church must convert to synodality and have faith/trust in the Spirit who always leads his Church.

 

To grow in synodality, the Church must respond to the Spirit's invitation to become a more community-based Church of brothers and sisters, equal in their life as disciple, an "inclusive" Church capable of "recognizing and appreciating the richness and variety of gifts and charisms" of its members, including the least of these, a Church that credits them with their good faith and must become accustomed to living in the pluralism of ideas (PD 9). This requires in particular:

a) opening of all ministries to those who are currently excluded (women, married men, LGBTQ+ persons, etc.) according to their competence and charisma,

b) relationship of equality between all members of the Church whatever their responsibility are since they are sisters and brothers. This means in the present situation relationship of equality between laity and clergy, even at the level of decision-making,

c) revision of governance, including the separation of powers,

d) establishment of small ecclesial communities (promoted by Vatican II, see also EG 29)

e) the abolition of all kinds of sanctifications/ ordinations, only assignments/commissions, gladly in solemn form

All this would be in keeping with the Gospel and the situation in the early Church and at the same time it would be the decisive way out of the current Church crisis, to promote a discipleship of equal brothers and sisters taking on different responsibilities for the community in different ministries/services.

 

This involves promoting:

a) training in synodality,

b) the creation of synodical structures, including the creation of particular synods to settle disputes, especially when the “depositum fidei” is at stake, whose existence is not left to the will and sensibility of the clergy and whose functioning expresses co-responsibility and not a simple consultative character;

c) the definition of procedures to prevent the sensus fidei fidelium from being left to the good will or sensitivity of priests and bishops; this implies the establishment of academic freedom for Catholic theological researchers;

d) the establishment of new structures (national and continental ecclesial assemblies, patriarchates or continental episcopal conferences, ;etc.);

e) the establishment of structural forms of consultation, exchange and comparison with other Christian Churches;

f) the creation of a new legal system with separation of powers, participation in decision-making and independent control of power.

 

Hence the 24 proposals expressed within the “Ten Thematic Nuclei” proposed by the Vatican

 

I.             THE JOURNEYING COMPANIONS

 

The journey that our Church undertakes, leaving the comfort of the present situation to go towards an "unknown" future, in order to transform itself into a synodical Church, can seem dangerous, as it was for the people of the Hebrews at the call of Moses: we should expect recriminations, like those of the Hebrews at the time of the crossing of the Red Sea (Ex. 14, 11-12).

This journey, the "common march" of the People of God "with the whole human family" (PD 29), requires overcoming the tendency of the Catholic Church and Catholics to act in the world separately from others, not to mix with other Christian Churches or other social actors. It implies profound reforms, expressed in the 24 proposals presented below, in order to improve the capacity of the Church to accomplish, with the participation of all its members in communion, its missions, namely the proclamation of the Gospel, and the reformulation of the message for a 21st century world.

This implies in particular:

a)    reorganizing the Church to adapt it to its mission and to what it is, 

b)   modifying its governance (separation of powers, clerical and lay co-responsibility) by introducing a synodical functioning,

c)    rethinking the meaning and organization of the services (ministries) it needs (desacralization, access to men and women...).

 

But this journey is necessary so that the Church does not risk being reduced to a sect, and can accomplish its missions in communion. According to Matthew, Jesus said: " Neither is new wine put into old wineskins. If it is, the skins burst and the wine is spilled and the skins are destroyed. But new wine is put into fresh wineskins, and so both are preserved.” (Matthew 9:17),

Do not be afraid because we will be accompanied by the blow of the Spirit, as Jesus promised us « “If anyone loves me, they will keep my word, and my Father will love them, and we will come to them and make our home with them… the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, she will teach you all things and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you.” (Jn 14, 23 et 26)

 

Pr1: All baptized, men and women, and not only those who practice in the parishes, constitute the Church and are therefore the journeying companions. Members of other faiths are also journeying companions. All of good will are welcome on this journey

 

For this reason, since its inception in 1996, WAC has worked with other movements for the reform of the Catholic Church, beginning with those that represent people and groups usually left on the margins of the Church (women, remarried divorcees, married priests, LGBTQ+ persons, etc.), but also with ecclesial forms that prefigure a more inclusive and participatory way of being Church (grassroots ecclesial communities, etc). On many occasions, WAC has also worked alongside popular movements and grassroots organizations committed to peace, social justice and the integrity of creation.

 

II.           LISTENING

 

Each disciple is a dwelling place of Jesus and receives the Spirit (Jn 14:23-26).  Therefore, all disciples must be listened to in order to give each of them the opportunity to share what they have perceived of the Gospel. Without doubt, "listening is the first step", but to be authentic, it implies recognizing that the other has something to say that may concern me, and inviting them to participate in the decisions that result from the dialogue. Otherwise, the simple act of listening risks becoming a means of reaffirming one's own superiority and the inferiority of others, even their exclusion.

There are many people towards whom the ecclesiastical institution has a "debt of listening": the laity, but especially lay women, young people, workers, sexual minorities, etc.

Pr2: A synodical church must organize itself in such a way that all its members can be heard and listened to.

 

III. SPEAKING OUT

 

In the logic of the above, each disciple should not be afraid to share what he or she perceives of Jesus' message and the way it is presented and lived within the Church. Is this not what Jesus implies in the Parable of the Talents (Matthew 25:14–30)?

But in order to "promote a free and authentic style of communication within the community and its bodies", it is first necessary to recognize a true freedom of expression, which is unthinkable as long as the expression of opinions against the majority or the official word leads to disciplinary sanctions or de facto censorship.

However, the word is currently monopolized by clerics and often even by bishops. This situation gives the false image of a Church made up of clerics only.

 

Pr3: It is therefore essential that, all members, i.e.in the present situation the laity included, be able to speak in the various organs of the Church, in celebrations and in the external media, in a spirit of sharing and attentive listening to each other, without condemnation.

Pr4: To this end, formation for all members, i.e. in the present situation for clergy and laity, should be organized to enable them to acquire the attitudes and skills necessary for the practice of truthful dialogue in mutual respect, as well as the skills for non-destructive conflict management.

 

Pr5: Pluralism of ideas must be fully legitimized so as not to encourage conformism.

 

IV. CELEBRATING

 

IV.1 Sacraments and the Meaning of the Mass

 

When we celebrate the sacraments and especially the Eucharist at Mass, their liturgy is often "separated" from life, because it is considered a "sacred space and act" in which a ritual is performed that is no longer capable of speaking to men and women today.

 

Pr6:  Rethinking celebrations and their liturgy so that they

- express in a comprehensible symbolic form their link with the Gospel, faith and life, integrating the existential experience of the people, the journey of the community and the socio-cultural context in which it evolves.

- ensure that this encounter of each disciple with Jesus Christ and with his or her brothers and sisters in the course of the celebrations will increase and nourish his or her desire, strength and capacity to respond to the calls of Jesus, to live a life more coherent with the Gospel and to witness to it more effectively.

 

Pr7: Rethink the meaning and place of the sacredness in celebrations and especially in the Mass,

 

Jesus having revealed to us that there is no longer any need to make sacrifices because every human being has a direct relationship with God. And Jesus died for living love to the extreme consequences.  

Thus, the Eucharist is the thanksgiving meal to which Jesus invites a community in order to nourish its members with his word and his being under the species of bread and wine shared in memory of what he is, of his life given, of his death and his resurrection. Jesus is thus present at this Eucharistic meal:

1) within the community itself, gathered in his name: " For where two or three gather in my name, there am I with them”. (Mat 18:20),

2) in each of its members: " Anyone who loves me will obey my teaching. My Father will love them, and we will come to them and make our home with them” (Jn 14:23),

3) through his word "for he speaks as the Holy Scriptures are read in the Church" (Sacrosanctum Concilium 7),

4) by the bread and wine thus shared in memory of him

 

Consequently, in order to preside over the Eucharist, there is no need for celibate males to be placed above the other disciples to act "in persona Christi" and having the "power" to "make Jesus present", for he himself tells us: " For where two or three gather in my name, there am I with them " (Mat 18:20). It is the people of the baptized, organized in communities, who celebrate under the moderation of one of its members, within the framework of a Church made up of ecclesial communities, living cells of a synodical Church.

The current model of priest generates a two-class Church, which Jesus never proposed and which contradicts what Paul said to the Galatians: " There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus" (Gal 3:28). Moreover, this model leads the current ecclesiastical institution to organize communities around fewer and fewer priests, instead of allowing local communities to celebrate, generating "deserts of communities”.

 

Pr8: Explain the meaning of the Eucharist and the impacts on its liturgy in view of the latest results of theological, historical and exegetic research.

 

Pr9: Rethink the theology of ministries, the status of ministers, the state of a priest, the notion of "priesthood", desacralizing it, ridding it of the notion of "representative of God and Christ on earth", and opening it to women as well as to men. Develop a new system of services for the community

 

Pr10: Consider the priesthood as "service of the evangelical word and of community life". See it as a task to animate, in co-responsibility with the laity, the services devolved to every community, the evangelical witness, prayer, community meditation of the Bible. This involves the celebration of the sacraments and especially Eucharistic sharing, the service of communion within the community and of this community with other communities. It includes also formation, teaching and transmission of the faith, responsibility for the material life of the community.

 

IV.2 The Need for small (grassroots) Ecclesial Communities

 

Small (grassroots) ecclesial communities carry out the missions of the Church by working, together with their brothers and sisters in humanity, for justice and peace so that it can be said: "There are no poor among them" (Acts 2 and 3) and "See how they love one another". These small communities are made up of a limited number of members living a koinonia (communion), which allows for celebrations, personal deepening, evangelization, prayer, fraternity and active and fraternal presence in the world in a flexible and decentralized organization.

 

Pr11: In order to celebrate and vivify the celebrations and the ecclesial life, it is necessary to set up small (grassroots) ecclesial communities close to the inhabitants of a neighborhood, or to the members of a movement, or of an association, or of a social and professional environment. These basic ecclesial communities must be connected to each other, in order (1) to be in communion with the universal Church and (2) to be challenged in such a way that they do not shape a Jesus to their own liking.

Thus, the small (grassroots) communities grouped together at the level of a parish constitute the parish community, the parish communities grouped together constitute the diocesan Community, the diocesan communities constitute the national Community, and all the national Communities constitute the universal Church.

The Church is thus both close to the places where men and women live, which allows it to present the Gospel message in the culture understood by these men and women, and universal, which allows it to build a unity in the diversity of approaches and languages, much more in keeping with the spirit of the Gospel than unity in uniformity (cf. Babel’s Tower).

 

V. CO-RESPONSIBLE IN THE MISSION

 

To proclaim the Gospel and to witness to it today, by what it says, lives and does, requires our Church

  I)  to present the Good News of Jesus in a language and culture adapted to the socio-cultural context of the various parts of the world of the 21st century, taking into account the evolution of the understanding of the world and of human relationships due to scientific progress, and of the Bible as a result of research in history, theology and exegesis. This implies, in particular, an appropriate revision of everything that no longer makes sense today. Thus

 

Pr12: Research in theology, exegetics and history of religions must be academically free in all research institutions and universities, including those managed by the Church

 

II) To accompany and support its members, as well as the men and women of the world today, in their life and their path for deepening their humanity. The organization of the Church into ecclesial communities greatly facilitates this accompaniment

Small (grassroots) Ecclesial communities facilitate the establishment of co-responsibility in this double mission of the Church by allowing all their members to contribute according to their charisms, competencies and availability. Indeed, the functioning of the communities at all levels of organization of the Church and the assignment of responsibilities and ministries necessary for their functioning at each of its levels of organization are based on equality between men and women, and exercised within the framework of synodical structures to allow all their members to participate actively in its life without exclusion. 

 

Pr13: Persons engaged in ministries must have the training, skills, and charisms required to perform them. They must be nominated from among the members of the community that they will serve, or be called by that community. They must be recognized (or empowered) by the Church as a whole in order to be a sign of universal communion and to be able to ensure the necessary links between communities, since each community is only a cell of the Church.

 

Pr14: Any person, man or woman, who is to exercise a function within a community will be "called" by a vote of the members of that community according to a synodical process that the Church will have to set-up by appealing to the sensus fidelium.

 

For example:

the person presiding at the celebration of the Eucharist (a priest at present) within a community will be proposed by that community by election and will have to be "recognized" or empowered at least by the diocesan community on which it depends;

the person in charge of the communion of the diocesan community (currently the bishop) will have to be proposed by election by the diocesan community concerned and recognized by the national community and the whole of the international Church through an international synodical body.

 

Pr15: In order to accomplish its missions in co-responsibility, our Church must equip itself at each of its levels of responsibility (e.g., local, parish, diocesan, etc.) with synodical bodies composed of representatives of the different components of the people of God and charged with discerning and making the decisions necessary for the life of the Church at that level (local, parish, diocesan synods, etc.), and for its mission.

 

VI. DIALOGUE IN CHURCH AND SOCIETY

 

There is currently little room for dialogue in the Church, both

- because the clergy are still assigned, at least implicitly, the functions of teaching, decision making and animation, with the result that communication is one-way,

- and because the imbalance of power in decision-making processes sometimes makes listening sterile.

 

The same is true of the participatory bodies, which are confined to a consultative role. Thus, the suggestions of the laity can sometimes be expressed, but they are not taken into account; divergences and conflicts are sometimes dealt with by seeking syntheses, but most of the time they are ignored or even repressed in law and in fact.

 

But when does the sensus fidei manifest itself and become binding? What happens when the sensus fidei and the magisterial function of pastors come into conflict (for example, in the prohibition of the use of artificial contraceptives)?

 

In fact, the hierarchy generally thinks that they have all the answers, so that they almost never dialogue, at least explicitly, with other ideal positions with a view to modifying their own, but rather tends to emphasize, sometimes even beyond reality, its autonomy from the demands of the world (see the insistence that "the Church is not a democracy", referred to in a certain way in PD 14, but in fact the Church is much more than a democracy).

 

However, in the relationship with society, it is necessary that the commitment to peace, justice and the integrity of creation be a "Church commitment" and not an accessory and optional activity of the Catholic beings. It must therefore be an integral part of the formation of clergy and laity.

 

Pr16: The Church must establish the necessary structures for dialogue at all levels of its organization, both for internal issues and for those concerning society, and the corresponding training for laity and clergy.

 

VII. WITH THE OTHER CHRISTIAN DENOMINATIONS

 

Relations with other Christian denominations are generally non-confrontational and sometimes cordial, but there are currently relatively few examples of collaboration. "Doing together everything we don't have to do separately" is a slogan far from reality.

. More decisive steps are needed both in common service to the world and in mutual acceptance:

 

Pr17: The Church must open discussion with other denominations (faiths) in order to create and develop appropriate structures for relations with other denominations (faiths) such as ecumenical councils of churches, ecumenical bodies (or others), to improve the reception of ecumenical dialogues and to develop Eucharistic hospitality.

 

VIII. AUTHORITY AND PARTICIPATION

 

It is necessary to open all ecclesial ministries to all disciples. The present weakness of the organs of synodality stems from their inadequate organization, procedures, etc., which can already be improved, and from the discrepancy between their conclusions and the decisions taken by the clergy in an entirely autonomous manner.

In the present situation, all powers coincide in the hands of one cleric, at the different levels of organization of the Church. This leads to dramatic scandals, as it was experienced in the sexual abuse crimes of clerics. Such a systemic dysfunction must first be recognised. In this respect, as a first step, the confession of personal guilt and personal acceptance of their responsibility by church officials is of great importance (even though they may have acted correctly according to the letter of Church law), particularly for the survivors of sexual and spiritual violence who must be acknowledged.

Therefore, it is proposed:

 

Pr18: No longer do all powers coincide in the hands of one person. The exercise of authority in the Church requires a distinction between legislative, executive and judicial powers.

 

Pr19: Ecclesiastical tribunals should be composed of competent clerics and laity and have the right to prosecute ex officio crimes of which they have knowledge without being subject to episcopal authorization and respecting the principles of "giusto processo" (knowledge of the accusation, right to adversarial proceedings, impartiality of the judge, etc.).

 

Pr20: As an example, it is proposed that the legislative power be the responsibility of a synod composed of clerics and laity elected according to a process to be defined, and the executive power be that of the bishop within an appropriate synod.

 

IX. DISCERNING AND DECIDING

 

Pr21: It is essential that the whole Church (all baptized men and women) participate in the elaboration and decision making concerning them..

 

This includes discernment, which involves listening and debate. Therefore:

 

Pr22 (cf. Pr16 Pr15): Provide the Church, at each of its levels of responsibility (e.g., local, parish, diocesan, etc.), with its own synodical bodies, including structures for appeal in case of strong opposition to certain decisions. These bodies should allow for dialogue, consultation and decision-making with the input of the members of the community who can thus express their sensus fidelium and contribute to the life of their community.

For a given level, members of the Church (including the ministers concerned) of that level must be part of these synodical bodies that have competence for the questions pertaining to that level (principle of subsidiarity).

 

X. FORMING OURSELVES IN SYNODALITY

 

Training in synodality implies, especially for the members of our Church, being open to the richness of the synodical organization, of the transition that it implies from the "current theology of the priesthood" to that of service within (and not above) the people that implies clerics and laity co-responsible for the organization, the government, the mission and the functioning of the Church, according to their charismas and their competences. This implies a new look at what is sacred.

Pr23: This training to synodality must therefore combine practice and reflection. To do this, it is necessary

1)   to practice synodality from now on, starting from what is currently possible. At this end, opportunities for action that are already canonically possible must be immediately addressed in the individual dioceses and implemented in "immediate programmes".

2)   to build step by step the elements proposed above from this experience.

 

Pr24: It is also necessary to train clerics and laity to work and make decisions in teams. For those who will be entrusted with a function of authority, to be trained to exercise it as a service to the people "infallible in credendo", in co-responsibility.

 

 

 

 


 

This document was prepared by François Becker (France) and Mauro Castagnaro (Italy) for WAC International.

 

The Coordinating Team of WAC International approved publication of this document on 23.February 2022.


[1] In this document:

-       PD stands for Preparatory Document Synod of Bishops 2023

https://www.synod.va/en/documents/english-version-of-the-preparatory-document.html

-       EG for Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium on the proclamation of the Gospel in today’s world

https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/apost_exhortations/documents/papa-francesco_esortazione-ap_20131124_evangelii-gaudium.html

 


by Colm Holmes 17 Apr, 2024
AGM in-person as well as on ZOOM
by Colm Holmes 15 Apr, 2024
Press Release 15 April 2024: Response to the Vatican letter "Dignitas Infinita"
by Colm Holmes 06 Apr, 2024
Overall control of the Study Groups should be given to the Synodal Office
by Colm Holmes 02 Apr, 2024
Dear Cardinal Mario Grech, We welcome and embrace ‘Synodality’ as a way of ‘being Church’ that is at once both ancient and new in our tradition. We support the three key themes of the Synodal Process: Communion, Participation and Mission . We understand that it is “how” we relate to one another in the Church, our capacity to ‘be together’ in harmony and unity (i.e. Communion), that will help us fulfil our various responsibilities and roles (i.e. Participation) and by doing so empower us as “Church” to bear witness to the love of God in the world and to the unity of all humankind in God (i.e Mission). We are a network of Catholics who treasure our faith tradition and love the Church because, as our name states; we are all the Church. We wish to contribute constructively to its renewal and reform and have good relations with all. It is because we care so deeply about the Church and its mission that we have felt compelled over the years to speak up and question the injustice of structures, practices and teachings that have blocked, rather than channelled, God’s grace in the world. Combined with a lack of accountability and a culture of secrecy, these unjust structures, practices and teachings have contributed (among other egregious wrongs) to the clerical abuse of children and vulnerable adults, and the institutionalised discrimination of half the world’s population, women. Since the Second Vatican Council, it is understood that all the baptised regardless of the different ministries and responsibilities they hold, share a foundational equality by virtue of their common baptism. Contrary to popular perception, the Church (in theory at least) is neither a democracy nor a dictatorship but an ordered community where power and authority are exercised as Christian service and not power over anyone, in accord with the Gospel message. Vatican II has been crucial in reshaping our understanding of “Church” and highlighting the co-responsibility of the laity, along with the hierarchy, in working for its renewal and reform. By highlighting the baptismal dignity and equality of every baptised person, the Council has helped us to more fully appreciate that the Holy Spirit works and speaks through each lay woman and man in the Church, as much as it does through each member of the male hierarchy. The significance of this insight is that the sensus fidelium (i.e the sense of faith in all the faithful) is now regarded to be as vital a part of the teaching authority of the church (i.e the magisterium) as that of the hierarchy. Pope Francis is the first Pope to promote the sensus fidelium in the Church and his global Synodal Process explicitly gives expression to it. It is regrettable however that this shift in the internal dynamics of the Church’s magisterium has not been communicated better or explained clearly to the majority of Catholics. Many remain unaware that the teaching authority of the Church is no longer the exclusive preserve of the hierarchy. They do not know that the bishops and the Pope are obliged to engage in meaningful consultation with all the People of God before making key decisions. Significantly, the change does not diminish the role of discernment assigned to the bishops by the Council, but it does oblige them to anchor their discernment in an authentic and faithful listening to the People of God. And this is where we have a problem. It is one thing to be told “We are all the Church together” and another to experience the reality of such declarations. The most glaring example of this incoherence is the way women are treated. While we acknowledge the inclusion of 54 Women amongst 70 non-bishops voting at the Synod, we must also express deep disappointment and concern at the lack of progress so far. Although the ordination of women priests was mentioned in many countries, it was not included on the agenda for the Global Synod in Rome and most reports on the female diaconate have never been published. This is simply not good enough. It is not in the spirit of synodality to ignore the concerns of women who make up half of the world’s population. We call on the bishops to renew their commitment to the Synodal Process; to authentically listen (i.e. listen from the heart) to their sisters in the Church, to relinquish all attachments to power and privilege and to stop clinging to an out-dated model of church. The Church can not be a credible or effective sign of God’s love and justice in the world as long as its own structures and processes lack transparency and discriminate against half the membership of the baptised faithful (i.e. women, half the population of the world). Instead of criticising society to change and act differently, it is time for the Church (i.e the whole church, the ordained and the laity) to become the change it proclaims about God’s peace and justice in the world and to lead by example in the way it organises itself at every level. We Are Church International calls for the following steps representing concrete signs of synodality to be endorsed by the Synod in October 2024: 1. Shared decision making with equal numbers of laity and clerics at all Synods, Assemblies and Councils. 2. Opening all Ministries to women and to married persons, regardless of their sexual orientation. 3. Appointment of bishops to be overseen by committees of lay and clerics. 4. Unity in Diversity allowing countries to deal with their respective important concerns such as the ones mentioned in 1. - 3. above in accordance with their culture and the legitimate concerns of the believers in these countries. 5. Draw up a Church Constitution setting out the rights and responsibilities of all the people of God and a new governance structure. WICR have prepared a very good draft: https://www.wijngaardsinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/wicr__background_and_sources_of_proposed_constitution__2022.pdf Colm Holmes, Chair We are Church International Email: colmholmes2020@gmail.com Phone: +353 86606 3636 Dr Martha Heizer, Vice-Chair We are Church International Email: martha@heizer.at Phone: +43 650 4168500 W www.we-are-church.org We Are Church International (WAC) founded in Rome in 1996, is a global coalition of national church reform groups. It is committed to the renewal of the Roman Catholic Church based on the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965) and the theological spirit developed from it.
by Colm Holmes 31 Mar, 2024
Archbishop of Dublin Dermot Farrell homily on 27 March 2024
by The Japan Mission Journal, Spring 2024 26 Mar, 2024
Soline Humbert: Tensions between Love and Law I have neither the desire nor the competence to write an analysis of Fiducia supplicans (FS). Instead, I would like to share some real-life stories which have resurfaced for me upon reading the document. The first wedding I ever attended was that of my aunt and the one I came to call my uncle. I was four years of age. I knew they were getting married, but not that it was a civil wedding, ‘irregular’ in the eyes of the church since my uncle was a divorcee. The years passed by, they had a child, but the marriage broke up soon after. The separation and subsequent divorce were quite painful and left a lot of bitterness in my aunt. Three decades passed without any contact; then my uncle somewhat unexpectedly reconnected with his daughter. I was close to my aunt, and I saw how this challenged her deeply, including at the level of her faith. She had kept all these years a diary of the breakup, which contained many painful entries. As she prayed she understood she should let go of it, which she eventually did. Soon after, she met up with her former husband, and much to everyone 's surprise and especially hers, their love was rekindled from the ashes. Now in their early eighties they decided they would remarry. My aunt now found herself again in an ‘irregular union,’ since my uncle remained a divorcee (from his first wife). For the second time I attended their wedding which was, again, only a civil wedding. They were so much in love and so close, that people thought that they were celebrating a diamond wedding anniversary, not a wedding! They looked as if they had spent the last fifty years together. It was the eve of Pentecost and I could see the imprint of the Holy Spirit everywhere in the love between them. Their love which had died had literally been resurrected and there was so much healing and joy. A wonderful miracle. But for the church authorities this was a sinful relationship, akin to adultery. There could be no ecclesiastical blessing. And my aunt would from now on be again excluded from receiving Communion. Until my uncle died that is, a few years later In this story, the Canon Law concern with order and regularity cuts athwart the human development and the decisions based on love. The sharp distinction between those in a ‘regular’ union celebrated and blessed in church, and the others, the ‘irregulars,’ reminds me of the label put on some children, until recently, dividing them into ‘legitimate’ and ‘illegitimate.’ Pope Francis seems aware that the categories of Canon Law are not necessarily the prism though which God views our relationships, and that there are relationships that just do not fit into them but need pastoral accompaniment. And this leads me to the other category of people mentioned in FS, the category more highlighted in discussions: same-sex couples. The early headlines shouted: ‘Vatican blessings for gay couples!’ I welcomed what appeared to be a more inclusive approach after the CDF document of a few years ago (‘No blessings for gays’), which it is. And for the first time the word couple is used. But I was dismayed when I started reading the list of all the conditions and restrictions. A good friend of mine, who is gay, called it: ‘a mean, little blessing.’ Of course that may be better than no blessing at all, just as a crumb of bread is better than a stone, but I do not recognize in it the extravagant generosity of the God of Jesus. I didn’t know whether to laugh or to cry when reading the expanded list of restrictions in the subsequent clarification from the Dicastery, because of pushback about the very notion that gay couples could be blessed at all. I couldn’t believe it ended up specifying the blessings would be all of 10-15 seconds. This reminded me of another story, about my grandmother-in-law’s wedding day, 100 years ago. Decades later, when she spoke about it you could still hear some of the pain and hurt. She, a Roman Catholic had married a member of the Church of Ireland (Anglican) in what was then called a ‘mixed marriage.’ Yes, they had received a nuptial blessing. But it had been at 9 o'clock, in the sacristy, with no guests. Another mean, little blessing,’ as prescribed by canon law. An addendum is that when her husband died she was advised by the parish priest not to go to his funeral service because it was in a Protestant church, and therefore would be gravely sinful. She went anyway! FS went out of its way to stress the difference between the pastoral and the doctrinal, and that blessings belong to the pastoral dimension and do not affect in any way the doctrinal teachings of the Church. There is no change, no development, and it may be over-sanguine to imagine that this is step in that direction; it could even by a ploy for fobbing it off. Love cannot be controlled, and we need a good dose of humility when we claim we know what God's plan is for people. Besides a long life, two decades in the ministry of spiritual direction have shown me that the ways of God don’t fit in neatly in our ‘regular/irregular’ church categories. The Spirit blows where it wills, and so does Love. Let us celebrate it, rejoice in it, give thanks for it wherever we find it. As the late Fr Mychal Judge OFM asked: ‘Is there so much love in the world that we can afford to discriminate against any kind of love?’ 2. Joseph S. O’Leary: Accompaniment, Dialogue, and Compassion The clergy have taken responsibility for matrimony not only in sacramental celebration of weddings, including preparation for marriage, but also in for the canon law aspect, ensuring that couples were validly married; in many countries married in church counted as valid in the State’s eyes as well. When Pope Francis deplores ‘clericalism’ one of the things he means is a bureaucratic concern with order and regularity that is harshly unsympathetic with people in irregular situations—single mothers, divorcees, priests awaiting laicization—, shunning them rather than accompanying them. The various conundrums that can arise, especially in countries where divorce is easily available, require a response. Pope draws on the category of blessing to bridge the gap between those whose marital lives are in order and those who live with messy situations. Blessings are not sacraments but ‘among the most widespread and evolving sacramentals’ (Fiducia supplicans [FS], 8). ‘Pope Francis proposed a description of this kind of blessing that is offered to all without requiring anything’ (FS, 27). The short document does not develop a rich, sophisticated theological concept comparable with Augustine on Grace or Luther on Justification by faith. Blessing is invoked for a practical purpose, to close the gap between love and law, between boldly welcoming all and continuing to police moral and legal behaviors. The distinction between objective and subjective morality (whereby something objectively immoral could be ‘diminished in guilt, inculpable, or subjectively defensible,’ as Paul VI put it), which allowed condemnation of artificial birth control in principle and pastoral accommodation of it in practice, might be seen as a similar practical solution that avoids facing an issue with honesty, in open discussion. In the present case the most remarkable tension, or contradiction, is between the rejection of blessings of same-sex couples, characterized as sinful, only a few years ago and the encouragement of such blessings in the new document. The most striking and innovating feature of FS is that it addresses a kind word to gays and lesbians, something the Vatican has not done officially since it began to address same-sex questions explicitly in 1975 (Persona humana), and most ambitiously in a treatise on ‘the problem of homosexuality’ in 1986. Gays and lesbians appeared on the Vatican radar screen only as a problem for the CDF’s sense of order, and there was no sign of dialogue with the people concerned or of pastoral accompaniment of them in their path in life. On a flight back from Africa last year, Francis told reporters: ‘People with homosexual tendencies are children of God. God loves them. God is walking with them. To condemn someone like this is a sin. To criminalize someone for homosexual tendencies is an injustice’ (Wall Street Journal, 5 February, 2023). Such an utterance says almost nothing, but it stresses the idea of accompaniment, and this is also the central thrust of FS and of the Pope’s pastoral policy in general. FS is the first time this policy has got an official articulation, minimal as it is; the danger is that it may be seen as solving the issue for now, instead of engaging in the human dialogue and theological rethinking that is required. Still talking of ‘someone like this’ (an embarrassed locution), the papal language does not yet really amount to listening or dialogue, since there is no forum for such dialogue in the Church (not even in the recent Synod). Gay couples have been blessed by common sense pastors, and would be regarded by many of the clergy with admiration and envy. They have wrongfooted Vatican teaching by the unexpected success of their relationships and their impact on society. But there is a group whose need is greater and that FS does not mention, namely the T in LGBT, suffering from what the doctors call ‘gender dysphoria.’ Cardinal Fernández rather shockingly promised conservative critics unhappy with FS that they will be happier with a forthcoming document condemning ‘gender ideology’ and surrogacy. This kind of horse trading and scapegoating is inappropriate in dealing with real human beings and their suffering. I have a friend who is biologically female but identifies as a man and has had his name legally changed to match that gender identity. The problems and sufferings he has had to face are crushingly severe. Here too the church has a duty of accompaniment and dialogue, not pontification and condemnation. A few years ago our former Irish President Mary McAleese, an outspoken Catholic woman, as well as Ssenfuka Joanita Warry, a brave activist in Uganda on behalf of heavily oppressed gays and lesbians, were disinvited by a Dublin-born cardinal from a women’s meeting supposed to be held in the Vatican. Here is ‘clericalism’ again, and the refusal of dialogue. Pope Francis has put compassion center stage in his reading of the Gospel. In fact, that is perhaps the central feature of the character of Jesus, his quick response to those in distress and his speed in coming to their assistance, as a healer. Is that the trait we think of when we think of him? A regular orderly life, a bit of prayer, an offering of our work for the glory of God, is not that our Christian ideal? But the Gospel makes other demands: generosity, compassion, self-giving, sacrifice. We easily miss our neighbor’s distress, though it is all around us if we care to look for it. We choose the street where we will not meet someone asking us for money, stepping to the other side. There is a striking line in that cruel and almost unbearable play, King Lear: ‘Expose yourself to feel what wretches feel.’ When Pope Francis talks of accompaniment and dialogue he is calling us to that kind of compassionate tenderness. His heart is in the right place, and he has done quite a lot to disentangle the Gospel from the bureaucratic knots that threaten to stifle it. He has called on the whole Church to join him in this, through the synodal process, so as to become a welcoming, empathetic church, shaking off hypocrisy. In striking gospel joy and God’s unbounded love he encourages a more progressive and positive vision of human nature and its unexplored potential. 3. Mary McAleese: The First Step on a Damascene Road? The Declaration Fiducia supplicans (FS) promulgated by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith with Papal approval on 23 December 2023 has provoked controversy and an unusual number of post-publication curial and papal explanations about its content. For all that its subject matter deals with access of Catholics in irregular unions to simple, spontaneous, informal blessings, in fact its import for the universal Church is far from simple. It deals with an issue that had been discreetly nudging some European dioceses, notably German, Austrian, Swiss, and Flemish, towards a new culture of inclusion of gay Catholics which countenanced priestly blessings for gay couples who were civilly married as jurisdiction after jurisdiction in the West made provision for same-sex marriage and traditional hostile attitudes to homosexuality gave way to acceptance, dismantling of oppressive laws, and the assertion of equal rights. In the global south the opposite was happening as resistance to gay rights provoked tighter laws against homosexuality (sometimes with the encouragement of Catholic bishops). The issue flared when the German Catholic Church’s Synodal Way proposed to permit church blessings for Catholic gay civilly married couples. Their plan was decisively dashed when in February 2021 the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith published, with papal approval, its Responsum to ‘a dubium regarding the blessing of the unions of persons of the same sex.’ It concluded that ‘the Church does not have, and cannot have, the power to bless unions of persons of the same sex.’ The reasons advanced included that they would constitute ‘a certain imitation or analogue of the nuptial blessing’; homosexual unions are in no way ‘similar or even remotely analogous to God’s plan for marriage and family’; such relationships are not ‘objectively and positively ordered to receive and express grace’: God ‘does not and cannot bless sin.’ If the responsum was designed to end all debate on the subject it had the opposite effect. Its judgmental language chimed badly with what had been widely perceived as a more tolerant attitude in papal comments to reporters on a flight back from Brazil after World Youth Day, 29 July 2013: ‘If someone is gay and is searching for the Lord and has good will, then who am I to judge him?’ However often overlooked was the fact that he had prefaced his remarks by restating church teaching that views homosexual acts as sinful. Indeed more recently he had echoed Pope Benedict’s opposition to admitting homosexual men to the priesthood when in a private session, he advised the Italian Bishops’ Conference on the subject of admitting gay men to seminaries to train for the priesthood saying: ‘If in doubt, better not let them enter.’ There can be little doubt but that in the clamor of disappointment that greeted the Responsum ad dubium, Pope Francis came under enormous pressure to bring some kind of reconciling clarity to his views particularly as the reports from Synodal discussions at diocesan level, by then were indicating strong support for reform of church teaching on homosexuality among other things. Shortly before the October 2023 Synod of Bishops met, a small group of conservative cardinals pushed Pope Francis for that clarity. He did not give the answer they wanted. Instead according to FS the possibility was opened up of revisiting the Responsum ad dubium and ‘offering new clarifications’ ‘in light of Pope Francis’ fatherly and pastoral approach.’ The Declaration was presented as an explanatory update on the Responsum ad dubium rather than what it actually was, a contradiction which still leaves a lot of doubt about where the Pope is steering the bigger debate on magisterial teaching on homosexuality. At one level the Declaration can be seen as little more than a limited concession to gay Catholic couples which permits a priest, if asked, to give informal ’short and simple pastoral blessings (neither liturgical nor ritualized) of couples in irregular situations (but not of their unions).’ The Declaration ‘remains firm on the traditional doctrine of the Church about marriage, not allowing any type of liturgical rite or blessing similar to a liturgical rite that can create confusion.’ To avoid confusion, the blessing must be free of all ‘wedding’ context including ‘any clothing, gestures, or words that are proper to a wedding’ (FS, 31). The Declaration suggests that ‘such a blessing may instead find its place in other contexts, such as a visit to a shrine, a meeting with a priest, a prayer recited in a group, or during a pilgrimage’ (FS, 40). At this level the Declaration slaps down the more liberal, advanced dioceses which had moved towards formal liturgical blessings for gay couples, while also slapping down the narrow view of blessings and even narrower view of God’s grace presented in the Responsum ad dubium which offered precisely nothing to gay Catholics. I remember my own reaction to the Responsum and in particular the realization that it had been published with the full acquiescence of Pope Francis. As the sister, mother, and mother-in-law of three deeply Christian gay men I was horrified to the point of despair, enough to send a scathing letter to Pope Francis in which I quoted (in my own translation) the final stanza from the famous Irish love poem ‘Dónal Óg’: You took my North, you took my South, You took my East, You took my West, You took the sun from me and you took the moon And I do believe you even took my God from me. Nowhere in that disheartening document could I see Christ, nowhere could I see God’s love, and worse still nowhere could I see a place to be part of a loving God’s complex family where grace flowed freely. I imagine I was not alone. I imagine Pope Francis was the recipient of a lot of letters from the faithful who felt they had reached the end of the road of faith in the Church and faith in him as its leader. The Declaration when it came was very much an act of putting a finger in that disintegrating ecclesial dyke. If that is all it is it will not be enough. At another level, the most critical level, the Declaration has to be potentially the first step on a Damascene road to the ‘fundamental revision’ of Catholic Church teaching on homosexuality called for by Cardinal Hollerich of Luxembourg, then President of the Commission of the Bishops' Conferences of the European Union (from 2018 to 2023) and currently Relator General of the Synod on Synodality. He believes ‘that the sociological-scientific foundation of this teaching is no longer true’ and that ‘we are thinking ahead in terms of doctrine. The way the pope has expressed himself in the past can lead to a change in doctrine.’ Cardinal Hollerich fortunately is not a lone voice, though he has many episcopal and other opponents within the Church. Accompanying each other, listening to one another, standing in the shoes of the other, and then starting anew in dialogue and consultation, we may outgrow frozen teachings on LGBT questions, as we previously overcame horrendous historic teachings which favored slavery, sexism, sectarianism, all with countless victims. Fiducia supplicans may seem to offer extremely little from Mother Church to her LGBT children, yet it could signal the beginning of an era of discussion, learning, and frank sharing, melting long centuries of hypocrisy.
by Colm Holmes 24 Mar, 2024
Excellent documentary on BBC2
by Colm Holmes & Ursula Halligan 24 Mar, 2024
How can we imagine the life of the Church in Ireland where people are co-responsible for the Church’s mission in different ways?
by Margaret Hebblethwaite 20 Mar, 2024
Always at the table
by Colm Holmes 18 Mar, 2024
The Curia takes control of the Synod
More posts
Share by: